corner
corner

Phys. Rev. B 79, 165106 (2009) [8 pages]

Suitability of III-V [XH4][YH4] materials for hydrogen storage: A density functional study

Abstract
No Citing Articles
Download: PDF (142 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Filippo Zuliani*, Andreas W. Götz, Célia Fonseca Guerra, and Evert Jan Baerends§
Theoretische Chemie, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1083, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Received 30 December 2008; revised 25 February 2009; published 15 April 2009

In the search for novel hydrogen storage media, the III-V hydridic material [NH4][BH4] is a natural candidate. It can store a high wt % of hydrogen and has a favorable volumetric density. Unfortunately it was found to decompose slowly at room temperature. It is of interest to consider chemically related materials, such as the series of [XH4][YH4] ionic solids (X=B,Al,Ga and Y=N,P,As). Even if the wt % of hydrogen in the heavier congeners is necessarily lower, they might offer superior material properties, notably higher (but not too high) stability. We have therefore performed a first-principles investigation of the cohesive energies of the XH4YH4 solid-state materials. In addition we have analyzed the bond character and energy within the building blocks of these materials, the XH4 and YH4+ molecular ions, including a comparison to the AH4 molecules (A=C,Si,Ge). The calculations have been performed within the density functional framework employing plane waves for the bulk materials and Slater-type functions for the molecules. A detailed study of the electronic structure reveals that the hydrides of the light (second period) elements, BH4, CH4, and NH4+, exhibit the strongest and shortest X-H bonds. This is caused by Pauli repulsion effects of the hydrogen substituents with the larger cores of the heavier (third and fourth period) elements. The important consequence is that in the crystals, where the ionic hydrides retain their identity and charge, the distance between the negative and positive ions is larger in the heavier systems, hence less Madelung stabilization and a smaller cohesive energy. Moving from [NH4][BH4] to heavier congeners thus does not seem to be a promising route to obtain more suitable materials for hydrogen storage. Other types of chemical variation (different substituents) on the [NH4][BH4] building blocks may prove more advantageous.

© 2009 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.165106
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevB.79.165106
PACS:
61.50.Lt, 71.15.Nc, 71.15.Mb

*filippo.zuliani@corusgroup.com

agoetz@few.vu.nl

guerra@few.vu.nl

§baerends@few.vu.nl