corner
corner

Phys. Rev. B 77, 214516 (2008) [39 pages]

Particle-hole symmetry and the dirty boson problem

Download: PDF (768 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Peter B. Weichman1 and Ranjan Mukhopadhyay2
1BAE Systems, Advanced Information Technologies, 6 New England Executive Park, Burlington, Massachusetts 01803, USA
2Department of Physics, Clark University, Worcester, Massachusetts 01610, USA

Received 10 January 2008; published 18 June 2008

We study the role of particle-hole symmetry on the universality class of various quantum phase transitions corresponding to the onset of superfluidity at zero temperature of bosons in a quenched random medium. To obtain a model with an exact particle-hole symmetry it is necessary to use the Josephson junction array, or quantum rotor, Hamiltonian, which may include disorder in both the site energies and the Josephson couplings between wave function phase operators at different sites. The functional integral formulation of this problem in d spatial dimensions yields a (d+1)-dimensional classical XY model with extended disorder, constant along the extra imaginary time dimension—the so-called random rod problem. Particle-hole symmetry may then be broken by adding nonzero site energies, which may be uniform or site dependent. We may distinguish three cases: (i) exact particle-hole symmetry, in which the site energies all vanish; (ii) statistical particle-hole symmetry, in which the site energy distribution is symmetric about zero, vanishing on average; and (iii) complete absence of particle-hole symmetry in which the distribution is generic. We explore in each case the nature of the excitations in the nonsuperfluid Mott insulating and Bose glass phases. We show, in particular, that, since the boundary of the Mott phase can be derived exactly in terms of that for the pure, nondisordered system, there can be no direct Mott-superfluid transition. Recent Monte Carlo data to the contrary can be explained in terms of rare region effects that are inaccessible to finite systems. We find also that the Bose glass compressibility, which has the interpretation of a temporal spin stiffness or superfluid density, is positive in cases (ii) and (iii), but that it vanishes with an essential singularity as full particle-hole symmetry is restored. We then focus on the critical point and discuss the relevance of type (ii) particle-hole symmetry-breaking perturbations to the random rod critical behavior, identifying a nontrivial crossover exponent. This exponent cannot be calculated exactly but is argued to be positive and the perturbation therefore relevant. We argue next that a perturbation of type (iii) is irrelevant to the resulting type (ii) critical behavior: The statistical symmetry is restored on large scales close to the critical point, and case (ii) therefore describes the dirty boson fixed point. Using various duality transformations we verify all of these ideas in one dimension. To study higher dimensions, we attempt, with partial success, to generalize the Dorogovtsev–Cardy–Boyanovsky double-epsilon expansion technique to this problem. We find that when the dimension of time ϵτ<ϵτc≃8/29 is sufficiently small a type (ii) symmetry-breaking perturbation is irrelevant, but that for sufficiently large ϵτ>ϵτc particle-hole asymmetry is a relevant perturbation and a new stable fixed point appears. Furthermore, for ϵτ>ϵτc2≈2/3, this fixed point is stable also to perturbations of type (iii): at ϵ=ϵτc2 the generic type (iii) fixed point merges with the new fixed point. We speculate, therefore, that this new fixed point becomes the dirty boson fixed point when ϵτ=1. We point out, however, that ϵτ=1 may be quite special. Thus, although the qualitative renormalization group flow picture the double-epsilon expansion technique provides is quite compelling, one should remain wary of applying it quantitatively to the dirty boson problem.

© 2008 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.214516
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevB.77.214516
PACS:
64.60.F−, 67.10.Ba, 72.15.Rn, 74.78.−w