corner
corner

Phys. Rev. B 76, 245306 (2007) [15 pages]

Dangling-bond spin relaxation and magnetic 1∕f noise from the amorphous-semiconductor/oxide interface: Theory

Download: PDF (439 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Rogerio de Sousa*
Department of Physics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

Received 28 May 2007; revised 18 September 2007; published 6 December 2007

We propose a model for magnetic noise based on spin flips (not electron trapping) of paramagnetic dangling bonds at the amorphous-semiconductor/oxide interface. A wide distribution of spin-flip times is derived from the single-phonon cross-relaxation mechanism for a dangling bond interacting with the tunneling two-level systems of the amorphous interface. The temperature and frequency dependence is sensitive to three energy scales: The dangling-bond spin Zeeman energy (δ), as well as the minimum (Emin) and maximum (Emax) values for the energy splittings of the tunneling two-level systems. At the highest temperatures, kBT⪢max (δ,Emax), the noise spectral density is independent of temperature and has a 1∕f frequency dependence. At intermediate temperatures, kBTδ and EminkBTEmax, the noise is proportional to a power law in temperature and possesses a 1∕fp spectral density, with p=1.2–1.5. At the lowest temperatures, kBTδ, or kBTEmin, the magnetic noise is exponentially suppressed. We compare and fit our model parameters to a recent experiment probing spin coherence of antimony donors implanted in nuclear-spin-free silicon [ T. Schenkel et al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 88 112101 (2006)], and conclude that a dangling-bond area density of the order of 1014 cm−2 is consistent with the data. This enables the prediction of single spin qubit coherence times as a function of the distance from the interface and the dangling-bond area density in a real device structure. We apply our theory to calculations of magnetic flux noise affecting superconducting quantum interference devices (SQUIDs) due to their Si∕SiO2 substrate. Our explicit estimates of flux noise in SQUIDs lead to a noise spectral density of the order of 10−12 Φ02(Hz)−1 at f=1 Hz. This value might explain the origin of flux noise in some SQUIDs. Finally, we consider the suppression of these effects using surface passivation with hydrogen, and the residual nuclear-spin noise resulting from a perfect silicon-hydride surface.

© 2007 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.76.245306
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevB.76.245306
PACS:
73.50.Td, 61.43.−j, 76.30.−v, 85.25.Dq

*Present address: Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada V8W 3P6.