corner
corner

Phys. Rev. B 75, 144406 (2007) [23 pages]

Disorder-induced magnetic memory: Experiments and theories

Download: PDF (2,438 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

M. S. Pierce1,2, C. R. Buechler1, L. B. Sorensen1, S. D. Kevan3, E. A. Jagla4, J. M. Deutsch4, T. Mai5, O. Narayan5, J. E. Davies6, Kai Liu6, G. T. Zimanyi6, H. G. Katzgraber7, O. Hellwig8, E. E. Fullerton8, P. Fischer9, and J. B. Kortright9
1Department of Physics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA
2Materials Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois 60439, USA
3Department of Physics, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USA
4Centro Atómico Bariloche, Comisión Nacional de Energía Atómica, (8400) Bariloche, Argentina
5Department of Physics, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA
6Department of Physics, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA
7Theoretische Physik, ETH Zürich, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
8Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, San Jose, California 95120, USA
9Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

Received 4 January 2007; published 5 April 2007

Beautiful theories of magnetic hysteresis based on random microscopic disorder have been developed over the past ten years. Our goal was to directly compare these theories with precise experiments. To do so, we first developed and then applied coherent x-ray speckle metrology to a series of thin multilayer perpendicular magnetic materials. To directly observe the effects of disorder, we deliberately introduced increasing degrees of disorder into our films. We used coherent x rays, produced at the Advanced Light Source at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, to generate highly speckled magnetic scattering patterns. The apparently “random” arrangement of the speckles is due to the exact configuration of the magnetic domains in the sample. In effect, each speckle pattern acts as a unique fingerprint for the magnetic domain configuration. Small changes in the domain structure change the speckles, and comparison of the different speckle patterns provides a quantitative determination of how much the domain structure has changed. Our experiments quickly answered one long-standing question: How is the magnetic domain configuration at one point on the major hysteresis loop related to the configurations at the same point on the loop during subsequent cycles? This is called microscopic return-point memory (RPM). We found that the RPM is partial and imperfect in the disordered samples, and completely absent when the disorder is below a threshold level. We also introduced and answered a second important question: How are the magnetic domains at one point on the major loop related to the domains at the complementary point, the inversion symmetric point on the loop, during the same and during subsequent cycles? This is called microscopic complementary-point memory (CPM). We found that the CPM is also partial and imperfect in the disordered samples and completely absent when the disorder is not present. In addition, we found that the RPM is always a little larger than the CPM. We also studied the correlations between the domains within a single ascending or descending loop. This is called microscopic half-loop memory and enabled us to measure the degree of change in the domain structure due to changes in the applied field. No existing theory was capable of reproducing our experimental results. So we developed theoretical models that do fit our experiments. Our experimental and theoretical results set benchmarks for future work.

© 2007 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.144406
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevB.75.144406
PACS:
75.60.Ej, 61.10.−i, 78.70.Dm, 07.85.Qe