corner
corner

Phys. Rev. B 73, 205122 (2006) [10 pages]

Spectral properties of Holstein and breathing polarons

Download: PDF (544 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

C. Slezak1, A. Macridin1, G. A. Sawatzky2, M. Jarrell1, and T. A. Maier3
1University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221, USA
2University of British Columbia, 6224 Agricultural Road, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada V6T 1Z1
3Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA

Received 9 February 2006; published 31 May 2006

We calculate the spectral properties of the one-dimensional Holstein and breathing polarons using the self-consistent Born approximation. The Holstein model electron-phonon coupling is momentum independent while the breathing coupling increases monotonically with the phonon momentum. We find that for a linear or tight binding electron dispersion: (i) for the same value of the dimensionless coupling the quasiparticle renormalization at small momentum in the breathing polaron is much smaller, (ii) the quasiparticle renormalization at small momentum in the breathing polaron increases with phonon frequency unlike in the Holstein model where it decreases, and (iii) in the Holstein model the quasiparticle dispersion displays a kink and a small gap at an excitation energy equal to the phonon frequency ω0 while in the breathing model it displays two gaps, one at excitation energy ω0 and another one at 2ω0. These differences have two reasons: first, the momentum of the relevant scattered phonons increases with increasing polaron momentum and second, the breathing bare coupling is an increasing function of the phonon momentum. These result in an effective electron-phonon coupling for the breathing model which is an increasing function of the total polaron momentum, such that the small momentum polaron is in the weak coupling regime while the large momentum one is in the strong coupling regime. However, the first reason does not hold if the free electron dispersion has low energy states separated by large momentum, as in a higher dimensional system, for example, in this situation the difference between the two models becomes less significant.

© 2006 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.205122
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevB.73.205122
PACS:
71.38.−k