corner
corner

Phys. Rev. B 73, 195113 (2006) [15 pages]

Frequency and temperature dependence of the optical conductivity of granular metals: A path-integral approach

Download: PDF (239 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

V. Tripathi
Theory of Condensed Matter Group, Cavendish Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Cambridge, J. J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom

Y. L. Loh
Department of Physics, Purdue University, 525 Northwestern Avenue, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907-2036, USA

Received 23 January 2006; published 17 May 2006

We study the finite-temperature optical conductivity σ(ω,T) of a granular metal using a simple model consisting of a array of spherical metallic grains. It is necessary to include quantum tunneling and Coulomb blockade effects to obtain the correct temperature dependence of σ, and to consider polarization oscillations to obtain the correct frequency dependence. We have therefore generalized the Ambegaokar-Eckern-Schön (AES) model for granular metals to obtain an effective field theory incorporating the polarization fluctuations of the individual metallic grains. In the absence of intergrain tunneling, the classical optical conductivity is determined by polarization oscillations of the electrons in the grains, σ(ω)=−(ine2fωm)∕(ω2ωr2iω∣∕τgrain), where ωr=e(4π∕3m)n is the resonance frequency, τgrain−1 is the relaxation rate for electron motion within the grain, and f is the volume fraction occupied by the grains. At finite intergrain tunneling, we find that σ(ω)=−(ine2ωfm)∕(ω2ωr2iω∣∕τrel)+σAES(ω,T), where τrel−1 is the total relaxation rate that includes the intragrain relaxation rate τgrain−1 as well as intergrain tunneling effects, and σAES(ω,T) is the conductivity of the granular system from the AES model obtained by ignoring polarization modes. We calculate the temperature and frequency dependence of the intergrain relaxation time, Γ(ω,T)=τrel−1τgrain−1, and find it is different from σAES(ω,T). For small values of dimensionless intergrain tunneling conductance, g≪1, the dc conductivity obeys an Arrhenius law, σAES(0,T)∼geEcT, whereas the polarization relaxation may even decrease algebraically, Γ(ω,T)∼(gEc2)[T2+(ω∕2π)2], when ω,TEc.

© 2006 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.73.195113
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevB.73.195113
PACS:
78.67.−n, 72.80.Tm, 73.23.Hk