corner
corner

Phys. Rev. B 71, 144512 (2005) [6 pages]

Difference between Al and C doping in anisotropic upper critical field development in MgB2

Download: PDF (478 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

M. Angst*, S. L. Bud’ko, R. H. T. Wilke, and P. C. Canfield
Ames Laboratory and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA

Received 27 October 2004; published 27 April 2005

The temperature dependence of the upper critical field Hc2 for both field directions in partially substituted polycrystalline MgB2 was determined. Whereas the suppression of Tc is similar for aluminum and carbon substituted samples, Hc2 is affected by the substitution in profoundly different ways. In the case of Al substitution changes can tentatively be described by intrinsic effects (shift of the Fermi level). In the C substituted samples, Hc2 is increased drastically, and extrinsic effects (disorder) have to play a major role. The strong contrast between the two substitutions is discussed, taking into account three relevant scattering rates.

© 2005 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.71.144512
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevB.71.144512
PACS:
74.25.Op, 74.20.De, 74.25.Ha, 74.70.Ad

*Email address: angst@ameslab.gov