corner
corner

Phys. Rev. B 60, 7541–7557 (1999)

Topological doping and the stability of stripe phases

Download: PDF (186 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Leonid P. Pryadko
Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey 08540

Steven A. Kivelson
Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095

V. J. Emery
Department of Physics, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973-5000

Yaroslaw B. Bazaliy
Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, Calfornia 94305

Eugene A. Demler
Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, Calfornia 93106-4030

Received 12 May 1999; published in the issue dated 1 September 1999

We analyze the properties of a general Ginzburg-Landau free energy with competing order parameters, long-range interactions, and global constraints (e.g., a fixed value of a total “charge”) to address the physics of stripe phases in underdoped high-Tc and related materials. For a local free energy limited to quadratic terms of the gradient expansion, only uniform or phase-separated configurations are thermodynamically stable. “Stripe” or other nonuniform phases can be stabilized by long-range forces, but can only have nontopological (in-phase) domain walls where the components of the antiferromagnetic order parameter never change sign, and the periods of charge and spin-density waves coincide. The antiphase domain walls observed experimentally require physics on an intermediate length scale, and they are absent from a model that involves only long-distance physics. Dense stripe phases can be stable even in the absence of long-range forces, but domain walls always attract at large distances; i.e., there is a ubiquitous tendency to phase separation at small doping. The implications for the phase diagram of underdoped cuprates are discussed.

© 1999 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.60.7541
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevB.60.7541
PACS:
74.72.-h, 74.25.Ha