corner
corner

Phys. Rev. B 49, 12339–12340 (1994)

Reply to ‘‘Comment on ‘Theory of impure superconductors: Anderson versus Abrikosov and Gor’kov’ ’’

Download: PDF (63 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Yong-Jihn Kim and A. W. Overhauser
Department of Physics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana 47907

Received 12 November 1993; published in the issue dated 1 May 1994

That the Abrikosov-Gor’kov theory of an impure superconductor seriously violates Anderson’s theorem is reaffirmed. The contrary assertion, together with other statements in the Comment, are shown to be incorrect physically, mathematically, and historically.

© 1994 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.49.12339
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevB.49.12339
PACS:
74.20.Fg, 74.62.Dh, 74.90.+n

See Also

Original Article: Yong-Jihn Kim and A. W. Overhauser, Theory of impure superconductors: Anderson versus Abrikosov and Gor’kov, Phys. Rev. B 47, 8025 (1993).